[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Time to rethink ifupdown

also sprach Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru> [2006.08.20.0858 +0100]:
> Having summarized the conceptual problems of the current ifupdown, I'll  
> describe my vision of what it should look like.

Please take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/netconf .

It would be great if you could help flesh out that page with your
excellent arguments and thoughts. Also, if you are interested in
working on netconf (which currently noone is), I'd be happy to
dedicate some time to it.

Can I forward your post to the netconf mailing list?

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
(on the statement print "42 monkeys"+"1 snake") btw,
both perl and python get this wrong.
perl gives 43 and python gives "42 monkeys1 snake",
when the answer is clearly "41 monkeys and 1 fat snake".
                                                         -- jim fulton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: