Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]
On (28/07/06 13:16), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
> I don't like it when people make using helper packages de facto
> required. And debhelper isn't standard (meaning that you can expect
> everyone to use it), merely very common. It is also very good, but its
> use must still remain optional.
That is fair enough. I understand the desire for choice.
> > But, yes, like all of debhelper it's just a convenience wrapper. If your
> > package is very simple then in the postinst add
> Good. If that is documented in the ssl-cert2 package, then all is well.
Probably requires updating to the new make-ssl-cert2 options.