* Matthew Garrett (mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk) wrote: > (For what it's worth, I have no great objection to the CDDL. Most of the > aspects of it that people claim to be unhappy with are also in the MPL, > and we still ship Mozilla quite happily. Yes, I know that most of > Mozilla is also available under the GPL. I don't really see why that's > relevant...) Just to point out that as of Firefox/Thunderbird 2 the entire codebase is triple licensed under the MPL, GPL and LGPL and any objection to the MPL as far as Mozilla is concerned is fairly academic at this point. -- Eric Dorland <eric@kuroneko.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature