Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch
Falk Hueffner <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:17:23AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Falk Hueffner <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > So in summary, if you don't care about portability to 64-bit windows,
>> > assuming sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long) is just fine.
>> Unless you compile with range checking pointers.
> The current implementation of range checking in gcc (mudflap) uses
> normal-sized pointers.
Even in 32bit? How do they cram all that info in there?