Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:17:23AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> So in summary, if you don't care about portability to 64-bit windows,
>>> assuming sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long) is just fine.
>> Unless you compile with range checking pointers.
> Are these patches fused into gcc nowadays, or do they still exist as separate
> patch sets?
> /* Steinar */
I'm not sure how fused they are but last I heard someone was working
on a Debian port with range checking with some success.