[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unstable? nah. :-)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> http://www.crackerjack.net/adserton3.png
> 
> That production server has been running debian/unstable since it's inception
> in january of 2004, with dselect updates happening every couple of days. It
> was running apache, postfix, mysql, mydns. Despite being "unstable", there
> was never a problem that resulted in more than a couple of minutes' downtime
> during updates.
> 
> It was finally retired today, after 875 days of uptime, not because there
> was a problem with it, just because there was a price problem with the
> hosting provider it's colocated at. For an "unstable" distribution, it gave
> me the most stable server experience I've ever had.
> 
> Go debian!!!!!

That rocks.  What did the machine do?  (I want to forward this email
to a Windows admin friend of mine.)

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEiJYAS9HxQb37XmcRAutJAKCfRnDTgnkBj8dH4O/yiW5kZ+ML5QCfUqyK
/xav1PBTucel2Ey6va4V2BY=
=s9+j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: