Re: gcc 4.1 or not
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > I found one serious bug in 4.1.1 though (#370308) which needs to be
> > fixed before 4.1 can be the default (since it produces a bogus error
> > on some Perl headers which get included by many packages). Matthias
> > is aware of this and is (I think) working on an update already (one
> > single patch needs to be reverted). gcc-defaults can be changed after
> > a new 4.1.1 package enters the archive.
> Well, he also just downgraded that bug with the rationale that gcc-4.1 isn't
> the default compiler yet.
...and add the pending tag.