Re: gcc 4.1 or not
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I found one serious bug in 4.1.1 though (#370308) which needs to be
> fixed before 4.1 can be the default (since it produces a bogus error
> on some Perl headers which get included by many packages). Matthias
> is aware of this and is (I think) working on an update already (one
> single patch needs to be reverted). gcc-defaults can be changed after
> a new 4.1.1 package enters the archive.
Well, he also just downgraded that bug with the rationale that gcc-4.1 isn't
the default compiler yet. So hopefully we are really on the same page
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.