On Friday 26 May 2006 00:29, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Manoj Srivastava: > > I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of > > what I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other > > people who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I > > find that my decision to vaive my personal requirements of two forms > > of ID was probably a mistake, and I am probably not going to be > > signing any of the keys. > > Wouldn't it make more sense to encourage people to mark the signers of > Martin's key as non-trustworthy in their personal web of trust, at > least if the signatures were created in a specific time frame? I would be more inclined to do that to the people who signed his key based on the Transnational Republic ID. I understand the trust level is an indication of how much you trust someone to thoroughly check identities before signing keys. OTOH, I haven't made it to a keysigning party since high school so I'm a little rusty on that part. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@ursine.ca Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber
Attachment:
pgpQ4WTP3eyev.pgp
Description: PGP signature