Re: Packages violating policy 8.2
>>>>> Goswin von Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> If the library is only internal then this falls under 10.2 I think,
> which is only a SHOULD diretive.
You're right. This falls under 10.2 and as I mentioned before, moving the
library to a subdirectory of /usr/lib is a pain.
> The bug though sounds like Kilian Krause is asking you to make the
> library public so he can link against it. Do you ship a shlibs file?
>> From the bug you aren't shipping a *.so link for linking which is
> correct for an internal library.
The library is an internal library and will not be made public. I'll tag the
bug wont-fix. Thanks for the help.