also sprach Michael Banck <email@example.com> [2006.05.11.1702 +0200]: > > That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications. > > Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean? Yeah well. IMHO that pretty much excludes all sensible licences. > > Why don't you choose (if possible) a less "viral" licence? > > Wow. First off, Kari does not appear to be upstream, so who are > you addressing? Him. I think he's in the better position to talk to upstream about it. Or in fact not make the package. > Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral? I have always done so and never used the GPL for any of my work. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system unix, because rebooting is for adding new hardware.
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)