Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Wednesday 12 April 2006 00:23, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > * Package name : rt2x00 > > > This package would contain version 2 of the rt2x00 drivers that are > > currently distributed as separate rt2400 and rt2500 packages (and a > > proposed rt2570 package). > > Did you talk with Aurelien (maintainer of rt2400-source/2500-source)? I'm > just wondering - perhaps he has already worked on something like this, or > planned to do so shortly? Yes, I have been in touch. He intended to package rt2x00 version 2 but found that the driver did not work for him. We may end up co-maintaining this. > > It probably belongs in experimental initially. > > I don't see why - there isn't an existing rt2x00 that would be replaced by a > potentially non-working new version, so it won't do any harm in unstable, > while getting wider exposure than it would in experimental. A 'don't > migrate to testing' RC bug would be a good idea, though. I suppose that would be better. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to write an incorrect program than to understand a correct one.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part