dicussion about patches ...
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:01:58PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> You missed the sarcasm. I understood Daniel's point to be that just
> because a patch is syntatically correct doesn't mean that it will (or
> should) be applied.
The question is if the problems with the patches and the reason for not
applying it will be commented, thus giving the author a chance to modify it,
or change his approach to fixing the bug, or if the patch will be utherly
ignored, which is an act of total contempt to his author as well as the users
affected by the bug.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: