[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: removal of svenl from the project


I don't know Sven enought for a comment, but this is the first time i
hear about problems with him.

Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org> writes:

> Step #2 requires the support of some 15 developers.

This meaning 15 is a representative set of 972 persons (1.5%) not
randomly choosen, which is obvioulsy wrong, and ridiculously small.

What is wrong here, is not even this demand for removal with such a lack
of clear evidence (you can wait for supporters, but you should also
convince other people, not so much in touch with Sven, you are right),
but a complete failure of this procedure. Such a lightweight proposal
should never have passed the DAM filter in step 1. Moreover, having only
1*Q persons needed to open such a GRAVE process is so incredible !!!

Marc Dequènes (Duck)

Attachment: pgp_CXMJMdAz7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: