[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#356241: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: no matching function for call to 'simplify_indexed(...

* Richard B. Kreckel <kreckel@ginac.de> [2006-03-11 22:09]:
> Jeez, according to my available list, gcc-4.1 is not even in sid, yet.  
> Maybe it would be more productive to calm down a bit and let people play 
> with that compiler a bit before making it the default.

What I mentioned were the plans according to

I'm currently building the whole archive and I'm sure the GCC
maintainers will take the results from that into account.  From what
it looks like at the moment, there are quite a few failures with G++
4.1 because its stricter than 4.0, so I'd assume there'll be an
announcement on d-d-a and a longer transistion period. (From the
posting to the gcc list above it seemed to me that the maintainers
thought the 4.1 transition would be easier.)

Anyway, I'm about half-way through the archive.  I'll report my
findings in detail when I'm done.
Martin Michlmayr

Reply to: