Re: Bug#356241: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: no matching function for call to 'simplify_indexed(...
Richard B. Kreckel writes:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >Your package fails to build with G++ 4.1. I'm filing this bug as
> >important for now, but when 4.1 will be the default compiler in
> >unstable (probably in a few weeks) I'll upgrade this to serious.
> Jeez, according to my available list, gcc-4.1 is not even in sid, yet.
> We are duplicating efforts since patches for gcc-4.1 have been applied
> upstream and I'm aware of them since a while ago.
> Maybe it would be more productive to calm down a bit and let people play
> with that compiler a bit before making it the default.
if you didn't play with it in the past five months, why would you
"play" with it now?
I appreciate Ben's work to make the archive buildable with 4.1.