Le dimanche 19 février 2006 à 11:22 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > You're turning this into non-sense. An NDIS wrapper is OBVIOUSLY for the > > exclussive purpose of using non-free Windows drivers. It is so obvious > > because nobody has written [1] free GPLed NDIS drivers. EVER. It has nothing > > to do with Wine and MSWord [2]. > > > > So, stop throwing unrelated points to this matter. Just fix the bug. Move this > > to contrib, with all the other warez wrappers. > > Some people obviously think that to qualify for main, there has to be > stuff in main that can be used with the program. No. It's a question of *purpose*. > Which I think is not > the point at all. If there were no MSWord file in main (which is not the > case, cf. my previous mail today), would we ask for antiword and friends > to be moved into contrib ? No. Antiword is a file viewer, not a driver layer. > The NDIS wrapper issue has nothing to do with the fact that there is no > NDIS driver in main. Indeed. It has with the fact there is no reasonable use of ndiswrapper that doesn't imply installing (and running) non-free software on the host machine. The key here is "reasonable". This is a practical case, not something to build up theories on fantasmatic uses that don't have any kind of possible application. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=