On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote: > > And I told you that you're wrong. There is _zero_ reference to > documentation packages, doc-base, install-docs or anything else in the > quote you replied to. It only spoke about _displaying_ the > documentation. The thread is about documentation packages. Don't pick my quote, I was answering to the thread question which basicly says "I want to ship documentation with this library, how should I do it?" > And yes, displaying is the most important step. If there are multiple, > well-established viewers for a documentation format (as you have > acknowledged), then it makes sense to think about adopting Debian's > document handling system for that format. After all, Debian is about There's no "Debian document handling system" there is a "Debian document registration system" which is not quite the same. > serving the users. It's not the users who should bend to what is > convinient for Debian. I didn't say otherwise. Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature