[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: documentation types

On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:47:14AM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:57:54AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > > And if the administrators choice is to not want any automatically created 
> > > formats, he may use a docbook program that displays it from the SGML or XML 
> > > source. Why not, such a tool may exist at one time or maybe does already.
> > 
> > It does not exist, before going into a useless discussion, show me some code.
> WTF are you smoking?

Show me a *documentation* package (i.e. those that install documentation
under /usr/share/doc/ and use doc-base's install-docs to register
documentation files [1]) that uses that. You are pointing me to a help
browser for a specific environment, GNOME has one, KDE has another one, in
Debian the management interface for system documentation is called doc-base
(includes dwww, dhelp, and doc-central) and it doesn't handle SGML, much less
XML, as far as I know.



[1] Such as doc-debian, or any of the ~400 packages that end in -doc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: