Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Eric Dorland <eric@debian.org> writes:
> If only 200 out of 1000 care enough to vote, then those are the people
> who get to make the decisions. We can't force developers to vote, so
> we can't be paralyzed into inaction by saying we can't do something
> because not enough people sent in a vote.
Actually, we can! We have a quorum requirement, and it was of course
satisfied. I notice that Marco has not suggested any amendments to
the Constitution to raise the quorum requirement. :)
Thomas
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>
- Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
- From: Eric Dorland <eric@debian.org>