Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> writes:
> One example is .config maintainer scripts, some of which are quite complex
> and worth writing in a higher-level language than shell.
This is surely true; Steve Langasek asked if this was a real issue in
Ubuntu or merely a potential issue.
Granted if it is a real issue, then why not use perl? Yes, I hate
perl too, but really, the argument "hey, people like Python too"
implies that we should have a scheme interpreter, a perl, a python,
emacs lisp, and well, everything anyone might want.
Or, we say "we aren't going to support *every* high-level language"
and stick to one.