Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field
Scripsit Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
> If they are also compiled with a toolchain unchanged from Debian,
> the binaries can legitimately have the same Maintainer: field as in
> Debian, because they are essentially the same package.
> If not, the binary packages should have different Maintainer:
> fields, unless the maintainer agrees to have his name on it.
You seem to require a standard of attribution in the Maintainer field
that Debian does not itself follow in our default procedures. To wit:
NMUs _within_ Debian keep the Maintainer field unchanged.
--
Henning Makholm "That's okay. I'm hoping to convince the
millions of open-minded people like Hrunkner Unnerby."
Reply to: