Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:43:48PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
> Fact is, the potential for confusion here never even occurred to
> me when we started doing this at Progeny. Quite the contrary to what
> Matthew suggests, it seems to me that changing the Maintainer
> field is a perfectly reasonable thing to do now that I'm aware of it.
Ah, my apologies. I'd assumed it was something that you'd probably
have thought about, so I'll happily withdraw that.
Matthew Garrett | email@example.com