Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:43:48PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
> Fact is, the potential for confusion here never even occurred to
> me when we started doing this at Progeny. Quite the contrary to what
> Matthew suggests, it seems to me that changing the Maintainer
> field is a perfectly reasonable thing to do now that I'm aware of it.
Ah, my apologies. I'd assumed it was something that you'd probably
have thought about, so I'll happily withdraw that.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: