On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:01:42AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Eh, because you believe a new lists.d.o list could take a bit of delay, > > an alioth list is better? > > > > Sorry, but I don't agree with the reasoning -- lists.debian.org is for > > general discussion lists, while alioth is more for packaging-specific > > projects or for new projects that haven't gone anywhere yet. > > well, given that there will most likely result a package or two from the > discussion, as well as a policy (hopefully :), and both of which will > need some kind of working repository to which we all have access, it > would make sense to start up an alioth project anyway. and while we're > waiting for the debian-webapp (or whatever name we decide on) mailing > list at l.d.o, we could also have somewhere to talk. later, we could > move en masse to l.d.o list when we have it and leave the project just > for the packaging/policy repository. > > so, that said, i'm going to go ahead and apply for an alioth project > for the packaging related stuff, as i was planning on doing so anyway. > if folks wouldn't mind a list hosted there, i can set it up. > > It's possibly worth looking at https://alioth.debian.org/projects/webapppolicy/ Regards, Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature