On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then weoh no. It is CVS now, and we should'nt move it to something different for now. Another one might like arch more, even an otherone might like to use even another version control system. I prefer to use the method Jeroen suggested.
BTW, I'm absolutely not religious about source control systems and
I would see it like you. But I can assure you that Ottavio did a transition
of another project which just left a single thing for me to remember:
Just use "svn" instead of "cvs". If he offers to do the work and sees
some advantages you can just trust him.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de