On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:40:40PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > I don't like downgrading the vim -> vim-runtime dependency since IMO if > > a user apt-get-installs vim he expect a fully working vim installation > > (including help and syntax highlighting). > Right; but having vim Depends: vim-basic, vim-runtime; and having vim-basic > include /usr/bin/vim from current vim.deb doesn't seem terribly difficult? No, it is not of course. I don't have any particular objection on such approach. > Or would vim-basic really not run without the stuff in -runtime? (If the above > means vim becomes an empty package, moving the stuff from vim-runtime into it > might be feasible/worthwhile) Yes, it would run, as vim-tiny runs now. No help (just a dummy page explaining what's going on), no syntax, .... But it would run. vim will become an empty package indeed, but I don't think that would be a problem. > > If there's the need of more vim features in the standard installation I > > would rather prefer to tune vim-tiny compilation including more > > features. On this subject, please note that adding gpm support will > > trigger the additional libgpmg1 dependency. > libgpmg1 is already in standard, and is 50k of .deb. Ok, not a problem then. But still, people have complained in this thread about a size increase of about 370 Kb (nvi vs vim-tiny + vim-common), moving towards vim + vim-common would mean an *additional* 340 Kb size increase. Is this still considered a fair increase by the installer/cd teams? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature