[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /run vs. /lib/run

* Josselin Mouette (joss@debian.org) wrote:
> Le lundi 19 décembre 2005 à 20:12 +0100, Thomas Hood a écrit :
> > Any other defenders of /lib/run?  Of /run?
> Please go ahead with /run. This has to the right place as no other
> proposed location makes sense.

I agree, it's no fun creating new top-level directories, but moving it
under /lib doesn't really make sense. It more surprising and less
consistent to have it under /lib.

Eric Dorland <eric@kuroneko.ca>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ 
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ 
G e h! r- y+ 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: