[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
/run vs. /lib/run
To
:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject
: /run vs. /lib/run
From
: Thomas Hood <
jdthood@yahoo.co.uk
>
Date
: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:12:37 +0100
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
43A70625.1080902@yahoo.co.uk
>
Any other defenders of /lib/run? Of /run? -- Thomas Hood
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Thomas Hood (on-list)
Thomas Hood (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From:
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From:
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From:
Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From:
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From:
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From:
Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org>
Prev by Date:
Re: /run vs /var/run
Next by Date:
(no subject)
Previous by thread:
Bug#344037: ITP: gcx -- gcx -- astronomical image processing and photometry gtk+ applicati
Next by thread:
Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Index(es):
Date
Thread