Re: /run vs. /lib/run

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:33:22 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 878xugbwm5.fsf@hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43A70625.1080902@yahoo.co.uk> (Thomas Hood's message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:12:37 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 43A70625.1080902@yahoo.co.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk> writes:

> Any other defenders of /lib/run?  Of /run?

I prefer /run.  It certainly doesn't belong in /lib (IMO).


- -- 
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux        http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFDpyceVcFcaSW/uEgRAhI0AKDdTi2N0xT//1jAerLRE2x/BXy6ogCg35wP
58H/gghiCj/KUwan63x7Vsg=
=wCE3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- /run vs. /lib/run
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian and the desktop
Next by Date: Re: /run vs /var/run
Previous by thread: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Next by thread: Re: /run vs. /lib/run
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread