Re: buildd administration
Ingo Juergensmann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > What problems are there today with buildd administration, please?
>> One obvious problem is that there is no documented contact address (just
>> search for "buildd" on http://www.debian.org/intro/organization). One
>> has to know by some magic who is responsible for which architecture.
> Well, there are mail aliasses for each arch following the
> $email@example.com scheme, but don't expect miracles from it (beside
> that sometimes problems seem to just go away silently ;)).
Why hasn't that been done before? Where else should this be documented?
> Another possible resource might be http://www.buildd.net/ </adv> ;) - I try
> to keep the information there as uptodate as possible, but it depends on the
> will to cowork with the buildd admins/porters, too.
Ah, that's even better, there's actual names behind the buildd's. I'll
add that to the patch.
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich