[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: StrongARM tactics

In article <[🔎] 20051206091400.GA17882@tennyson.dodds.net> vorlon@debian.org writes:
>Um... no.  This is *porter* work; one does not have to be a buildd admin to
>analyze a build failure to see whether the package belongs in P-a-s, and
>there's no reason that the buildd admins alone should bear the
>responsibility for figuring out whether a permanent build failure should be
>fixed or ignored.  (Maintainers probably need to be involved in this
>process, but usually maintainers don't have the requisite knowledge about
>all our ports to make informed decisions on their own.)

I can do the analyzing, but what should I do with the results?
sparc@buildd.debian.org seems to be a black hole.  You'll need to find
someone willing to communicate with access to the buildd queues before
the porters can do anything.

>Wonderful.  Nice to see that you think P-a-s entries are somebody else's
>problem that should be "handled centrally".

The buildd administrators have made it clear that's the way they want it.
Blars Blarson			blarson@blars.org
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.

Reply to: