[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: StrongARM tactics

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:00:40PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:

> For ree:
> How portable is scaning /dev/mem between position 0xc0000 and 0xf0000 in
> 512 byte blocks for some magic number as a concept?

This will kernel oops on ARM platforms that don't have RAM starting at
physical address zero.  (Admittedly, this is due to a kernel bug --
specifically, valid_phys_addr_range() not being implemented for ARM.)

xdm has a similar issue:


Reply to: