[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?

On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:38:45AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:17 AM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> [...]
> >> On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes
> >> buildd logs,
> >
> > Then that description is wrong. It never did include buildd logs, and
> > AFAIK, there are no plans to that effect, either.
> It doesn't say that.
> It says:
> "Notices about uploaded packages for the unstable distribution, from
> developers, buildds and katie, the archive sentinel."
> i.e. the only e-mails from buildds involved are "notices about uploaded
> packages", not logs.

Sorry, that was a massive typo on my part.  I thought "buildd output", and
wrote "buildd logs" when I meant "buildd .changes files".  My question, as
amended, though, still holds -- are the .changes associated with the upload
of autobuilt packages supposed to go to d-d-c, and if so, are they there and
I'm just not seeing them in the list archive?

- Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: