Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:54:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:37:05PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > Personally, I think it's cryptographic snake oil, at least in so far
> > > A signed deb has a seal of procedence and allows one to track the path it
> > > made through the system, and who changed it.
> >
> > That's what the .changes file is for.
>
> Only possible if the .changes file is still accessable, and going through
> the d-d-c archives isn't exactly convenient.
>
> On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes buildd logs,
Then that description is wrong. It never did include buildd logs, and
AFAIK, there are no plans to that effect, either.
--
.../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/
../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/
-.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ /
../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../
---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/
Reply to: