Re: Secret changes for binNMUs
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:02:36AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
> > (the cvs, not deb)
> Which sbuild CVS repo?
It is a SVN repo now, the one used by the buildd infrastructure.
> BTW, are there any good reasons why the autobuilders don't use the
> packaged version anywat? The differences are minimal.
Last time I looked the changes seemed to be pretty big, but merging is
of course a mid-term goal.
In any case, the Debian package is the fork, while the sbuild in
wanna-build is upstream. As I understand it, we do not plan to use the
Debian sbuild package for the buildds, the upstream one works well
enough (and currently much better for what the buildds need)