Re: Packages file missing from unstable archive
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Packages file missing from unstable archive
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:02:54 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20051101080254.GA28496@cyan.localnet>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87k6fvs84c.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- References: <87ek68fvaj.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20051026051100.46ee511c.ian_bruce@fastmail.fm> <20051026171230.GA6348@roeckx.be> <20051026143504.21819254.ian_bruce@fastmail.fm> <87wtjzj4rf.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> <20051026164721.3ffbad6e.ian_bruce@fastmail.fm> <20051027011538.GB21941@kitenet.net> <20051027080622.GB17675@sandbender> <20051027115651.GC31904@khazad-dum.debian.net> <87k6fvs84c.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 09:48:35AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Zsync checksum files are, depending on block size, about 3% of the
> file size. For the full archive that means under 10G more data. As
> comparison adding amd64 needs ~30G. After the scc split there might be
> enough space on mirrors for both.
Adding amd64 needs 30G? Since when?
And stuff doesn't go on the mirrors because it's "under 30G", it goes on
the mirrors because it provides useful benefits. Where're the statistics
showing how much zsync signatures actually help?
Cheers,
aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: