On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:57:27PM +0200, Andreas Fester wrote: > Shachar Shemesh wrote: > [...] > > What I thought was to use "0" as SO version, which is a standard way to > > state that the interface is not guarenteed to remain stable. I'll also > I did not know about this. Do you have a pointer to the appropriate > section in the Debian policy or some other document? No, because it's not standard at all. There are plenty of libraries in Debian with sover 0 that *are* stable. The right answer is, if binary compatibility isn't going to be provided, don't ship a shared library. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature