Re: When is the C++ transition needed?
Scripsit "Brian M. Carlson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Thursday 06 October 2005 12:45, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> I notice that the newest upload of pstoedit has reverted the C++
>> transition name change; instead of libpstoedit0c2 sid now contains
>> libpstoedit0, as in sarge.
>> Does this not need transitioning for the ABI change?
> It does need transitioning.
Having discovered that the lack of transitioning actually does lead to
real breakage, I have now filed a bug, #332859.
Henning Makholm "Manden med det store pindsvin er
kommet vel ombord i den grønne dobbeltdækker."