Re: When is the C++ transition needed?

[Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>]

Scripsit "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
> On Thursday 06 October 2005 12:45, Henning Makholm wrote:

>> I notice that the newest upload of pstoedit has reverted the C++
>> transition name change; instead of libpstoedit0c2 sid now contains
>> libpstoedit0, as in sarge.

> This is, IMHO, incorrect.

It is how I interpret these changes files snippes from the PTS:

  Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:42:12 +0200
  Source: pstoedit
  Binary: pstoedit libpstoedit-dev libpstoedit0
  Architecture: source i386
  Version: 3.42-1
  [...]
  Changes:
   pstoedit (3.42-1) unstable; urgency=low
   .
     * New upstream release.
     * [configure.ac, configure] Look for Magick++-config instead of
       GraphicsMagick++-config; put in AM_MAINTAINER_MODE.
     * [debian/control] Update dependencies for new imagemagick.
     * [debian/libpstoedit0.files, debian/rules, debian/control] Dropped "c2"
       from libpstoedit0c2.

  Date: Sun,  7 Aug 2005 15:36:36 +0200
  Source: pstoedit
  Binary: pstoedit libpstoedit-dev libpstoedit0c2
  Architecture: source i386
  Version: 3.40-1
  [...]
  Changes:
   pstoedit (3.40-1) unstable; urgency=high
   .
     [...]
     * [debian/control, debian/rules, libpstoedit0c2.files] C++ ABI transition;
       libpstoedit0 is now libpstoedit0c2. Based on a patch by Henning Makholm
       <henning@makholm.net>. (Closes: #321632)
     [...]

  Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:50:57 +0200
  Source: pstoedit
  Binary: pstoedit libpstoedit-dev libpstoedit0
  Architecture: source i386
  Version: 3.33-14

-- 
Henning Makholm  "They discussed old Tommy Somebody and Jerry Someone Else."