Re: dh_libtool proposal (-dev dependencies on -dev from libtool)
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005, Stephen Frost wrote:
> don't include static library dependencies in the Depends. libtool does
> actually survive just fine if the first-level .la files go missing in
> fact, as I recall, it's the ones below that which cause it to break,
> even for shared linking when none of them are needed at all anyway. :/
Which is clearly a hideous bug, and upstream acknowledges this.
> In the end I think this is a bad idea and we should instead focus and
> spend time on fixing the actual problem than trying to build some hack
> around it.
Seconded. No dh_libtool, please.
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot