On Sep 13, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote: > > There isn't? I thought this has been standard GPL lore for a very long > > time - if you link to an *interface* which has a GPL-compliant > > implementation, it does not matter if you also are incidentally runtime- > > compatible with a non-GPL-compatible implementation. Agreed. > The next question would then be: is it allowed to implement an > interface without that requireing anything of your license? Yes. Next? -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature