On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:46:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Paul TBBle Hampson <Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au> writes: >> Mind you, the license/OpenSSLCallback conflict neccessarily >> segregates the packages into two camps, those which are GPL, and >> those which need the callback only supplied by the OpenSSL-linked >> libcurl. > You misunderstand my complaint. I suspect I did not, but I possibly misdirected my answer. > What I complain is that, once the packages have been so segregated, it > is now *impossible* to even install both kinds on the same Debian > system at the same time. *That* is intolerable. I totally agree. Somehow the _current_ situation managed to be worse than any of the three solutions I proposed. And the dlopening of libldap.so bug is prolly still present, going by the package long description... -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) Paul.Hampson@Anu.edu.au "No survivors? Then where do the stories come from I wonder?" -- Capt. Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Caribbean" License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.1/au/ -----------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpYoI0H7_AGq.pgp
Description: PGP signature