Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
On Sep 09, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> > It does not work this way. If you believe that a license is not free
> > it's up to you explaining why.
> Well, I'm explaining that it isn't free because of DFSG#5. However, it
> seems that you are refusing such arguments de facto.
I am refusing them as long as you cannot clearly show how DFSG#5 forbids
some restrictions present in the CDDL.
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>