Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:00:54AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 08, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> > > Indeed, the "choice of venue is a fee" argument is just that: an
> > > opinion which has at best no clear roots in the DFSG, therefore it
> > > cannot make a license non-free.
> > Yeah, but there is certainly more than a single person arguing that we should
> > not distribute software with such licence.
> There is nothing wrong with this, and I'm not a fan of choice of venue
> clauses either, but they should try to modify the DFSG then.
Claiming this is only a single person arguing that, when i pointed him to a
50+ thread where more than 10 person participated, well, i don't know what you
think about lying and hypocricy, but i certainly find something wrong with it :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Debian OpenSolaris port, exchange with Sun folks in webforum/MailingList
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)