Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, curl-library@cool.haxx.se, Damian Pietras <daper@daper.net>, Miernik <miernik@ffii.org>, 318590@bugs.debian.org, 325643@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 04:04:27 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20050902110427.GE3691@tennyson.dodds.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, curl-library@cool.haxx.se, Damian Pietras <daper@daper.net>, Miernik <miernik@ffii.org>, 318590@bugs.debian.org, 325643@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050902102418.GA24681@raptus.dandreoli.com>
- References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0508302238430.16991@yvahk3.pbagnpgbe.fr> <[🔎] 20050901194016.GC28686@frodo.home.lxtec.de> <[🔎] 20050902091628.GA26744@raptus.dandreoli.com> <[🔎] 20050902095613.GA17592@chistera.yi.org> <[🔎] 20050902102418.GA24681@raptus.dandreoli.com>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3)
> > So the libcurl3 in sarge and etch will have ABI incompatibilities?
> at the release time of etch this problem will regard only
> external software. this kind of installations will be able to use
> libcurl3-openssl-dev package or switch to GnuTLS.
> is this reasonable enough?
No, definitely not. You cannot change the ABI of an existing library
package, especially not one that's been in a stable release; you need
to rename it instead.
But no one has yet answered my question: *why* are there ABI differences
between the gnutls and openssl builds?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: