Re: arch, svn, cvs
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:13:30PM +0000, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> This is an interesting thread: cvs, svn, arch, tla, baz,
> bzr, git, .. (have I forgotten any?). Lurking,
Darcs! My favorite tool these days, incredibly easy to use, and seems
to Do The Right Thing (TM) with merges more frequently than arch stuff.
www.darcs.net.
-- John
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
- From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: "Thaddeus H. Black" <t@b-tk.org>