On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:45:47AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl> writes: > > > Having those bugs classified as "patched" IMO gives the wrong impression > > to casual readers (read non-developers) as it indicates that the problem > > has already been fixed. > > > I personally read "patched" as synonymous to "patch has been applied", > > which is just not true. > > Something like "patch available" would sound a lot better to me than > "patched," although it's longer. That's then still true even if the patch > is bad and just hasn't been triaged yet. Shorter: "with patch" (which could be moved to "with good patch" if the tag +patch and +confirmed where used? "patched" looks more like it should be used when +patch and +pending have been used) Regards Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature