On Monday 29 August 2005 20:31, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Frans Pop <email@example.com> [2005.08.29.2022 +0200]: > These classes reflect the tags on the bugs therein. > "Patched" > "More information needed" > "Will not fix" > ... Hmm. IMO listing bugs without those tags as "Unclassified" is confusing, especially with the emphasis that is now put on it. It implies that action is required where I think that is not always the case. Also I don't think that "Patched" as a description for tag 'patch' is correct. The bug has not been patched, there just is a _proposed_ patch available. There is no certainty that the patch is either correct or will be accepted by the maintainer. I would sooner accept a description of "Patched" for 'pending'. What do others think of the new, extended subdivision of bugs? Personally I don't see enough difference in status between "unclassified" and "moreinfo" to warrant separating them.
Description: PGP signature