Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?
Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> It is out of date since it does not explain ~ yet. Maybe, if you have
> the time and since you just looked at the matter closely anyway, you
> could draw up a few lines and send a patch?
I'm certainly willing to do so, but I thought that policy wasn't ready to
change yet. Wasn't it waiting on implementation of that feature in dak,
which is currently using ~ internally for something else?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: