Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?
From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:59:52 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87pss6tc5j.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050822091335.GA31802@andaco.de> (Andreas Jochens's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:13:35 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 20050822091335.GA31802@andaco.de>

Andreas Jochens writes:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> - must have successfully compiled 98% of the archive's source (excluding
>   arch-specific packages)

Andreas Jochens writes:
> It is not possible to build 98% of the unmodified source packages from 
> the 'unstable' distribution. This is true for any port including i386.

Make it 98% of the packages buildable on the accepted port with the highest
build percentage.


How was 98% arrived at?
-- 
John Hasler

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?
  - From: Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org>
- Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

References:
- Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?
  - From: Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de>

Prev by Date: Re: vancouver revisited
Next by Date: Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...)
Previous by thread: Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?
Next by thread: Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread